No. 01Tashkent · Across UzbekistanOn warehouse audits
Talking to staff about revisions

· Liability · 4 min read

Talking to staff about revisions

Revisions make staff anxious; explain the purpose openly and cooperation improves.

The moment a revision is announced, the warehouse goes quiet. Storekeepers glance at each other, someone arrives earlier than usual, someone suddenly falls ill. That is not a sign of guilt: many people take a revision as the start of "distrust" or dismissal. A well-run conversation lowers the anxiety and becomes the best source of information, because the details that are not in the documents are known to the staff. Below are four stages: before the revision, during the count, when a difference turns up, and afterwards.

Before the revision: why and what happens

Gather the team for ten minutes and say four things openly: the purpose (to check the records and processes, not to hunt for someone), the dates, what is expected of them (goods in place, documents ready, taking part in the count), and who will learn the results and when. Remind them of their rights too: to take part in the count, to know about differences and to give a written explanation. The exact procedure depends on internal rules and the law, so check it beforehand. Say who may ask questions.

This check concerns not you but the records and the processes.

During the count and when a difference turns up

Let the person responsible for the stock take part in the count: they help find goods in their place and see the result with their own eyes. Keep questions about the work: "Where does this item usually sit?" "On what date was this document entered?" Talk to one person at a time, not in front of the others and without halting the work.

When a difference is found, the conversation runs like this:

  1. Choose a quiet place: a separate room, enough time, no phones.
  2. Start from the fact: "The statement shows a difference of 9 pieces on this position. Shall we look at the documents together?"
  3. Ask open questions about how the work runs, not about the person.
  4. Listen, do not interrupt, note the main points.
  5. Close with a short summary: what you understood, what happens next and when an answer comes.
  6. The employee writes the explanation in their own words and takes time to think. Do not push them to sign a ready-made text.

Changing the words changes the tone:

  • instead of "Who took it?", say "What documents are there for this position? Let's look together";
  • instead of "Admit it", ask "What do you think could have caused this difference?";
  • instead of "Others don't do that", speak about this case alone, with no comparisons.

What is not allowed

  • accusations and threats: "we'll fire you", "we'll hand you to the authorities". Fear turns an explanation into a defence, not a fact;
  • a public "reckoning" in front of colleagues;
  • pressure to sign, signing without reading, writing down words the employee did not say;
  • covert recording and similar tricks;
  • announcing a decision on liability or punishment during the conversation.

On disciplinary or financial liability, deductions from pay and dismissal, rely only on internal rules and the law, and consult a lawyer or the HR department. A revision interview is not the place for such decisions.

An example: a warehouse of nine staff

At a distributor's warehouse the manager gathered the team for ten minutes after work and explained the purpose. Two employees said openly that they put returned goods at the edge of a rack without a document and write it up later. That was not a confession but information about the process. For that reason the revision checked returns first and the receiving routine was corrected. In a frightened team those words would never have been spoken.

After the revision

Tell the team the result in general terms: what was found, what actions are being taken. No personal blame, but be clear. Ask staff for ideas on improving the process, and thank them for taking part. If an employee has openly admitted a mistake, use it to fix the process and do not shame them with it in front of others.

Conclusion

An open, respectful conversation turns a revision from an opponent into a partner. Four things are enough: a clear purpose, a quiet place, open questions and a written explanation without pressure. The Reviziya team can help you prepare the conversation routine and a note for staff.